Skip to main content

1965 F250’s Rejuvenation

More
3 years 4 months ago #216952 by Urchy87
Replied by Urchy87 on topic 1965 F250’s Rejuvenation
Cheers guys. It will be another week or more until I can get back into it. The plugs are new. I’ll look to get a few parts in the interim so they can go straight in when I am able to get at it again.

Adventure before Dementia.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 4 months ago #216953 by Blackduck59
With the Holley idle mixtures, Holley spec's to use a vacuum gauge and get the highest reading. Turn each mixture screw the same amount.
Power valve may need playing with if it was not set up correctly. rough guess is you would need a 6 or 8. Again the vacuum gauge will tell you what vacuum you are getting at cruise and the power valve really needs to be shut at that.
There are plenty of tuning videos etc on these.
Just redid one on an F100 with 351, goes hard.

Cheers Steve
The following user(s) said Thank You: cobbadog

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 4 months ago #216991 by Blackduck59
On a side note, Holley now uses a blue gasket material that is re-usable, handy if having to change the power valve when tuning.
Cheers Steve

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 4 months ago #217002 by Urchy87
Replied by Urchy87 on topic 1965 F250’s Rejuvenation
Thanks Steve. Appreciate the advice.

Adventure before Dementia.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 3 months ago #217316 by Urchy87
Replied by Urchy87 on topic 1965 F250’s Rejuvenation
The carby kit finally turned up at the local automotive store. Unfortunately it had the older black gaskets in it but that’s life. Removing the rock hard old gaskets took some persuasion and was by far the hardest part of the refurb. Once installed it certainly has cleaned up throttle response but if anything highlighted the miss fire even more.

After that not helping I did what I should have done at the start and tracked down a compression tester. Cylinders 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 had 125psi which is great for the inline 300 but......that leaves cylinder 3. Cylinder 3 has ZERO PSI. Damn it.

Haven’t had a chance to look into it yet but thought I should put a bit of an update in here as it’s been a few weeks. Hoping it’s a valve issue and nothing too sinister. From memory they were the valves which were a bit sticky when I tapped them prior to putting the lifters, rods and rockers back in place. I’ll do a dodgy version of leak down testing to source the issue as soon as I get a spare couple hours.

Other than this I’ve tidied up some grounds and replaced a few perished cables. It now cranks over as it should instead if being very lazy. Have also removed some suspect brake line sections which I will have made up replace for piece of mind.

If I’m not back in here beforehand, have a decent Christmas period and thanks for the help with my first project of the transportation type.

Adventure before Dementia.
The following user(s) said Thank You: cobbadog, PaulFH

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 3 months ago #217321 by asw120
Replied by asw120 on topic 1965 F250’s Rejuvenation
Since it has hydraulic lifters, there is one quick thing you can try. While running with the rocker cover off, try backing off the valves on #3 until they rattle. I have had dodgy lifters pump up before after doing a valve job and they would not go down! (holds valve/s slightly open)
Unlikely, but you might get lucky.

Thanks for the update, Jarrod.


“I offer my opponents a bargain: if they will stop telling lies about us, I will stop telling the truth about them”

― Adlai E. Stevenson II

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 3 months ago #217326 by hayseed
Replied by hayseed on topic 1965 F250’s Rejuvenation
get an Oil pot & pump 3-4 Pumps of Oil down the plug hole & see if It makes a Difference to the Compression.

"Be who you are and say what you feel...
Because those that matter...
don't mind...
And those that mind....
don't matter." -

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 3 months ago #217509 by Urchy87
Replied by Urchy87 on topic 1965 F250’s Rejuvenation
Hey. Tried both of those plus took the manifolds off to see if I could tell what’s going on but no real luck, well in saying that it is building 25 psi now. Meant to take photos of the valves but forgot. Will be pulling the head off at this rate unless there is an easy way to clean all of the crap out of the valve whilst installed. Did try to hit it with degreaser and carby cleaner as that’s what I had handy but it didn’t help. Are the engine cleaning products any good. I’m really sketchy about using them but if it saves work I’d be tempted. Thanks.

Adventure before Dementia.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 3 months ago #217510 by JOHN.K.
Replied by JOHN.K. on topic 1965 F250’s Rejuvenation
The exhaust valves may have cracks around the edges......Ford used some pretty cheap valves back in the day......Ford invented the use of aluminised steel for exhausts ,considerable saving on the alloy steel other makes used ......catch was the aluminized coating meant the valve could not be ground or faced.....or the coating was gone.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
3 years 3 months ago #217511 by cobbadog
Replied by cobbadog on topic 1965 F250’s Rejuvenation
Sometimes there are NO short cuts worth taking. I would pull the head and be done with it, sort it out and refit.

Cheers Cobba & Cobbarette
Coopernook, The Centre of our Universe
Working on more play time.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.636 seconds