- Posts: 1380
- Thank you received: 1337
Yanky Iron Fix II
3 years 5 months ago #238854
by V8Ian
Replied by V8Ian on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
The following user(s) said Thank You: 180wannabe, PaulFH
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 7877
- Thank you received: 7962
3 years 5 months ago #238855
by Mrsmackpaul
Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
Replied by Mrsmackpaul on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
So what brand of motor is that, Hall Scott ?
Paul
Paul
Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
Please Log in to join the conversation.
3 years 5 months ago #238857
by V8Ian
Brocky or Swishy may have some idea.
Replied by V8Ian on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
Dunno Paul, I just found and posted with all the information supplied.So what brand of motor is that, Hall Scott ?
Paul
Brocky or Swishy may have some idea.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
3 years 5 months ago #238872
by Dave_64
Replied by Dave_64 on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
Just doing a bit of research in an old motor manual, and on the web, seems the above vehicle COULD be a one-off 1951 KW made to a special order.
"Curbside Classics" has a little bit on it, firstly KW had to extend the front by a foot, 12", to accomodate the engine.
It was a marine derived, twin six,bolted together to give a total of 1090 cu-in, 1900 ft-lb torque and could be run up to 600 hp OR up to 900 hp in supercharged form, but I tend to think that would be in marine format.
Biggest problem at the time was none of the usual transmission manufacturers could supply an off the shelf transmission/ clutch.
Doesnt say how they got around that issue.
IF it is the same truck, which I reckon it is, it was a one-off built to pull a tanker.
Finding a bit more, seems that although fuel consumption would have been cruel, given the low grade fuels available at the time, it was more a reliability issue why it wasnt a raging success!
Hall-Scott had a superb name in big displacement marine and stationary engines right up until the mid to late 50's until being taken over byHercules.
Not a bad read if you want to chase it up a bit.
Hall-Scott had been supplying large six cylinder petrol motors for quie a few manufacturers, including Fageol ( later Peterbilt), KW, Autocar etc.
Seems they were pitched in direct competition ( in petrol engines) against makes like Continental, Wausheka, Hercules to mention a few.
BTW, that particular vehicle MAY have been a chain drive bogie, which would have been a single diff!
Imagine the size it would have been!
Dave_64
"Curbside Classics" has a little bit on it, firstly KW had to extend the front by a foot, 12", to accomodate the engine.
It was a marine derived, twin six,bolted together to give a total of 1090 cu-in, 1900 ft-lb torque and could be run up to 600 hp OR up to 900 hp in supercharged form, but I tend to think that would be in marine format.
Biggest problem at the time was none of the usual transmission manufacturers could supply an off the shelf transmission/ clutch.
Doesnt say how they got around that issue.
IF it is the same truck, which I reckon it is, it was a one-off built to pull a tanker.
Finding a bit more, seems that although fuel consumption would have been cruel, given the low grade fuels available at the time, it was more a reliability issue why it wasnt a raging success!
Hall-Scott had a superb name in big displacement marine and stationary engines right up until the mid to late 50's until being taken over byHercules.
Not a bad read if you want to chase it up a bit.
Hall-Scott had been supplying large six cylinder petrol motors for quie a few manufacturers, including Fageol ( later Peterbilt), KW, Autocar etc.
Seems they were pitched in direct competition ( in petrol engines) against makes like Continental, Wausheka, Hercules to mention a few.
BTW, that particular vehicle MAY have been a chain drive bogie, which would have been a single diff!
Imagine the size it would have been!
Dave_64
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 685
- Thank you received: 3427
3 years 1 month ago #241877
by overlander
Replied by overlander on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
The following user(s) said Thank You: 180wannabe, Inter-Action, PaulFH, V8Ian, wee-allis, xspanrman, oliver1950
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 685
- Thank you received: 3427
3 years 1 month ago #242136
by overlander
Replied by overlander on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
The following user(s) said Thank You: Inter-Action, Mrsmackpaul, PaulFH, wee-allis, xspanrman, oliver1950
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 257
- Thank you received: 313
3 years 1 month ago #242138
by Inter-Action
Replied by Inter-Action on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
Wow! Long buggers. Long bonnets. Anyone got any idea of what's under the bonnets?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 535
- Thank you received: 814
3 years 1 month ago #242147
by 77louie400
A lot more space than under the bonnet of my LNT louie
Replied by 77louie400 on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
Wow! Long buggers. Long bonnets. Anyone got any idea of what's under the bonnets?
A lot more space than under the bonnet of my LNT louie
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 685
- Thank you received: 3427
3 years 1 month ago #242155
by overlander
Replied by overlander on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
Inter-action. I'd say they use what engines that have been available to the Australian transport industry. Different length laws allows manufacturers to produce models like that I have posted. COE models are well out of favour. later on there will be photos of a Freightliner with a 16v71T engine and yeah- that truck has a long bonnet of note. Pete
Please Log in to join the conversation.
3 years 1 month ago #242159
by Dave_64
Replied by Dave_64 on topic Yanky Iron Fix II
Just as a bit of an aside to the above, Youtube shows Quite a few 12V92 T's and the odd 16v71, in both cab over and conventionals.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.309 seconds