- Posts: 2653
- Thank you received: 42
conundrum
14 years 11 months ago #8615
by atkipete
Replied by atkipete on topic Re: conundrum
Well they are talking about "since 1969" so it sounds like it is early 70s.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
14 years 11 months ago #8616
by Swishy
Guys
thanx for the input
Me BullDog Bulletin sez Oct 1975 the article twaz written
I dunno much about tri drives as me thinks I've never seen one in the flesh
they mainly used in road train territory I'd guess
with single steer up front @ times the beast might wanna go straight ahead
ButEyeDo........................
Cya
[ch9787]
OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST
There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
Replied by Swishy on topic Re: conundrum
Guys
thanx for the input
Me BullDog Bulletin sez Oct 1975 the article twaz written
I dunno much about tri drives as me thinks I've never seen one in the flesh
they mainly used in road train territory I'd guess
with single steer up front @ times the beast might wanna go straight ahead
ButEyeDo........................
Cya
[ch9787]
OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST
There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
Please Log in to join the conversation.
14 years 11 months ago #8617
by atkipete
Replied by atkipete on topic Re: conundrum
Well assuming those Macks were built in 74 or 75, it would put them just ahead of Atkinson. Steering might have been a problem, with tri drive and one steering.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
14 years 11 months ago #8618
by
Replied by on topic Re: conundrum
The ONLY time the steering would become a problem, would be if it was loaded incorrectly.
This would only be noticable at slow speed.
With the drilling rig fitted, then the weights would about the same at all times, so cant really see a problem.
regards greenie [smiley=vrolijk_1.gif]
This would only be noticable at slow speed.
With the drilling rig fitted, then the weights would about the same at all times, so cant really see a problem.
regards greenie [smiley=vrolijk_1.gif]
Please Log in to join the conversation.
14 years 11 months ago #8619
by atkipete
Replied by atkipete on topic Re: conundrum
I just wonder why they didnt go for an 8x4 chassis in this case. Does anyone know what became of these units ?
The big 5 axle Atkinson shown on the front cover of my book actually started out as an 8x4 but pulling two or three trailers needed extra traction at jump ups and was converted to tri drive. With "volume loading" regulations in Queensland and big Kirkstall front axles Noel Herrod was able to put plenty of weight on the front end and told me it steered the same as any other truck.
The big 5 axle Atkinson shown on the front cover of my book actually started out as an 8x4 but pulling two or three trailers needed extra traction at jump ups and was converted to tri drive. With "volume loading" regulations in Queensland and big Kirkstall front axles Noel Herrod was able to put plenty of weight on the front end and told me it steered the same as any other truck.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
14 years 11 months ago - 14 years 11 months ago #8620
by Swishy
Gudday M8
Steering can B a problem in soft ground, greasy roads, where the front steer break grip normally @ slow speed makeing a turn etc
well it duz with our close cuple dolly's which would/could perform like a tri drive in the steering dept
So how many tri drive or tri with pusher did Shambles have?
Right about here I should ad sum pix
https://www.nationalvehicles.com/image.php?image_id=314017
Movies anyone!
{If red X appears where pic should B. Right clik on red X n clik SHOW PICTURE}
Cya
[ch9787]
OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST
There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
Replied by Swishy on topic Re: conundrum
Gudday M8
Steering can B a problem in soft ground, greasy roads, where the front steer break grip normally @ slow speed makeing a turn etc
well it duz with our close cuple dolly's which would/could perform like a tri drive in the steering dept
So how many tri drive or tri with pusher did Shambles have?
Right about here I should ad sum pix
https://www.nationalvehicles.com/image.php?image_id=314017
Movies anyone!
{If red X appears where pic should B. Right clik on red X n clik SHOW PICTURE}
Cya
[ch9787]
OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST
There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
Last edit: 14 years 11 months ago by Swishy.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
14 years 11 months ago #8621
by
Replied by on topic Re: conundrum
Please Log in to join the conversation.
14 years 11 months ago #8622
by Swishy
GuddayM8
In a word No good
tooo big a jiggr to get round our F--- roundabouts, chikanes n traffic calmin devices
LOL
Nice lookn jiggr of Lampsons
Ifn we could only get the authorities to design n build rds to suit trucks n then let cars use m
instead of the udder way around
LOL
Cya
[ch9787]
OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST
There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
Replied by Swishy on topic Re: conundrum
GuddayM8
In a word No good
tooo big a jiggr to get round our F--- roundabouts, chikanes n traffic calmin devices
LOL
Nice lookn jiggr of Lampsons
Ifn we could only get the authorities to design n build rds to suit trucks n then let cars use m
instead of the udder way around
LOL
Cya
[ch9787]
OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST
There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.442 seconds