- Posts: 116
- Thank you received: 0
Hot Rod or HCV?
Paint?
Engine swap?
Modern upgrades to running gear?
There is a wide range of restorations and build ups going on, from full nut-and-bolt period restorations to putting truck cabs on one tonner chassis with blown v8's, although most of us I would imagine just want our vehicles to be as original as possible but safe and able to handle modern driving conditions.
But with lots of parts becoming increasingly rare, and retrofitting modern parts looking like a easier or better alternative, at what point does the term "hod rod" apply?
Your thoughts please Ladies and Gents.
Grant.
'79 F100- 302c 4spd&&'81 F350- Isuzu 6BB1&&Chamberlain Industrial MK11 (6G)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Go up to the search button . (3rd from left)
Type in hot rod..select all posts and hit search.
Plenty of debate in there if you have a few spare hours.
chocs
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Posts: 7271
- Thank you received: 6114
Paul
Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You'll get some reaction with this one.
I'm a "planning to build one day" "all talk no action" looking for ideas, participant on this forum.
In my 12 - 18 months of observation, the range of vehicles restored, modified or preserved have included everything from rusty ute's to resently retired prime movers.
From clean 'em up and get 'em running bangers to the re-fabrication of major structural sub componants and museum quality restos.
It seems a broad and tollerant church, but
on the subject of hotrod vs HCV, it gets a bit firey when the wheels, tyres and stance of the vehicle change to much away from period correct or original.
You won't see many Centerline mags on display or talk of "tubbing" here.
Paint is usually conservative or period correct (candy or House of Color, uh, not so much.)
Powerhouse donks? Keep it hidden.
Hot sleepers would probably slip in under the radar,
but by then you might want to to question what class of "motoring enthusiast" you really are.
My broad general opinion of the HCVC site?
Keep it simple, keep it straight and make it look like it can or has earned its way in life as a "proper working truck".
Hows that guys?
Pretty close?
-b
Mucking about on the edge
Please Log in to join the conversation.
It is only a couple of forum members that kick up a stink when they see hot rods, the greater majority of us enjoy having a look.
The moderators are cool with someone putting up pictures of there project if it is truck related, hot rod or not.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
My broad general opinion of the HCVC site?
Keep it simple, keep it straight and make it look like it can or has earned its way in life as a "proper working truck".
Hows that guys?
Pretty close?
-b
Bobsboy, I think you nailed it. One thing I like about this forum is asking a question, and after getting some answers you realise exactly what the question you wanted to ask was
The thing that got me thinking along this line was the thread on alternate engines for the Cummins 160.
I don't want to point fingers or question anyones taste, because while something might not be exactly the way I would have done it, that doesn't mean I can't appreciate the time and effort put in to achieve the end result.
But because the very nature of historic vehicles means that as the parts we require become older they become rarer, and I was trying to gauge the opinions on leaving the truck in the shed waiting for that elusive part versus "hot rodding" it with a few modern bits to make it easier to finish, drive and maintain.
Would putting a modern engine- driveline combo in an old truck merely because the originals are no longer viable lessen everyones appreciation of the final product?
Grant.
'79 F100- 302c 4spd&&'81 F350- Isuzu 6BB1&&Chamberlain Industrial MK11 (6G)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Maybe the rules are different in Victoria, but that would be a no-no in NSW. But then again I am aware of some very non-original trucks here registered the same way, so some clubs are not complying with the rules.
Beaver@ Museum of Fire
Please Log in to join the conversation.
But because the very nature of historic vehicles means that as the parts we require become older they become rarer, and I was trying to gauge the opinions on leaving the truck in the shed waiting for that elusive part versus "hot rodding" it with a few modern bits to make it easier to finish, drive and maintain
Its a pity that so many are left in the shed.
Where not many people will ever get to see them..
Looking back at the very history of many, many commercial vehicles, it is very often found that ol mate has modified the vehicle in some way shape or form, to keep the thing working in order to make a living.
Many times the modifications were made through necessity, other times made through choice.
The 'restorations' are many and varied, but they are being carried out to the owners 'requirements' at the time.
The reality of it is, no matter what the 'finished' article is, it carries that particular vehicle into the start of a new, usable life..
More often than not, their destiny would have been scrap metal, had ol mate not come along with a vision and a bag of loot.
Would putting a modern engine- driveline combo in an old truck merely because the originals are no longer viable lessen everyones appreciation of the final product?
I shouldn't think so Grant, with out a motor and box of any description in it, perhaps not many would get to see it, to appreciate it..
chocs
Please Log in to join the conversation.