New and old toys
6 years 4 months ago #190125
by Dave_64
Replied by Dave_64 on topic New and old toys
Lang, your top photo could almost qualify for the "how short can you go" posts!
Looking good.
Dave
Looking good.
Dave
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 4 months ago - 6 years 3 months ago #190131
by Lang
Replied by Lang on topic New and old toys
Yes Dave
It is only 6' 8" X 4' in the back.
Wheelbase is quite long and they ride very nicely. These early Weapon Carrier family were only built in 1941 and early 1942 based on the civilian Dodge pick-up of the time. Rated at half ton. The MASH ambulance is one of these early Dodges. They proved too high and too lightly built for military tactics and misuse.
In 1942 they brought out the much more robust 3/4 tonner - like my Carryall in the bottom photo. - with all the same running gear but completely redesigned chassis , tyres up from 7.50 to 9.00 etc to be stronger. They are really tough and were extremely popular with the troops and about 300,000 were built.
Of course the legendary 1946 onwards Power Wagon was only the Army Dodge with a hard cab (in fact the same 1938 cab as on my half tonner pictured). Compared with the early half tonner the 3/4 feel a lot more robust but are not nearly as nimble and the extra weight being pushed by 100hp of side valve six make the early truck the one of choice.
Both will out climb a Jeep any day with their single speed transfer case but super low first gear and still can do 55mph on the road. They were very popular with banana farmers on the steep hills - great climbers and hard to tip over.
If anyone is interested here is the WIKI story of the Dodge Weapon Carrier family.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_WC_series#WC...17,_WC26,_WC36,_WC48
Lang
It is only 6' 8" X 4' in the back.
Wheelbase is quite long and they ride very nicely. These early Weapon Carrier family were only built in 1941 and early 1942 based on the civilian Dodge pick-up of the time. Rated at half ton. The MASH ambulance is one of these early Dodges. They proved too high and too lightly built for military tactics and misuse.
In 1942 they brought out the much more robust 3/4 tonner - like my Carryall in the bottom photo. - with all the same running gear but completely redesigned chassis , tyres up from 7.50 to 9.00 etc to be stronger. They are really tough and were extremely popular with the troops and about 300,000 were built.
Of course the legendary 1946 onwards Power Wagon was only the Army Dodge with a hard cab (in fact the same 1938 cab as on my half tonner pictured). Compared with the early half tonner the 3/4 feel a lot more robust but are not nearly as nimble and the extra weight being pushed by 100hp of side valve six make the early truck the one of choice.
Both will out climb a Jeep any day with their single speed transfer case but super low first gear and still can do 55mph on the road. They were very popular with banana farmers on the steep hills - great climbers and hard to tip over.
If anyone is interested here is the WIKI story of the Dodge Weapon Carrier family.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_WC_series#WC...17,_WC26,_WC36,_WC48
Lang
Last edit: 6 years 3 months ago by Lang.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 3 months ago - 6 years 3 months ago #190229
by Lang
Replied by Lang on topic New and old toys
I had a couple of PM's about these Dodges. Here is the progression of the Dodge light trucks. Dodge 4x4 heavy trucks were the US Army mainstay in the 30's before GM took over the role with Chevrolet 1 1/2 ton 4X4 and GMC 2 1/2 ton 6x6.
Dodge specialized in the mid-range during the war. International Harvester built very similar vehicles for the Navy and Marines.
This photo shows how the Dodges were militarized. On the right is the VC model which is basically a complete standard civilian pick-up with 4x4 added. They made these in hard cab also - only in 1939/40.
In the middle is the 1/2 ton WC model. Still the VC chassis and running gear but militarised body trying to save metal and drop the height. They made these in hard cab also 1941 to early 1942.
On the left is the 3/4 ton WC model. A complete rewrite of the chassis, axles and body but same mechanicals. Much more robust and lower. No hard cab (except Carryall and Ambulance). Hundreds of thousands of these were made 1942 to 1945.
In 1946 they put the early hard cab on them and called them a Power Wagon.
Lang
This is what the Power Wagon looked like.
Dodge specialized in the mid-range during the war. International Harvester built very similar vehicles for the Navy and Marines.
This photo shows how the Dodges were militarized. On the right is the VC model which is basically a complete standard civilian pick-up with 4x4 added. They made these in hard cab also - only in 1939/40.
In the middle is the 1/2 ton WC model. Still the VC chassis and running gear but militarised body trying to save metal and drop the height. They made these in hard cab also 1941 to early 1942.
On the left is the 3/4 ton WC model. A complete rewrite of the chassis, axles and body but same mechanicals. Much more robust and lower. No hard cab (except Carryall and Ambulance). Hundreds of thousands of these were made 1942 to 1945.
In 1946 they put the early hard cab on them and called them a Power Wagon.
Lang
This is what the Power Wagon looked like.
Last edit: 6 years 3 months ago by Lang.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 3 months ago - 6 years 3 months ago #191019
by Lang
Replied by Lang on topic New and old toys
Last edit: 6 years 3 months ago by Lang.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Sarge, Southbound
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 3 months ago #191034
by jeffo
Replied by jeffo on topic New and old toys
The big dint in the right rear guard is for the spare wheel? Must have been a tight fit.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 3 months ago #191035
by Lang
Replied by Lang on topic New and old toys
Please Log in to join the conversation.
6 years 3 months ago #191036
by jeffo
Replied by jeffo on topic New and old toys
Does the pipe edge bar also hold against the tread?
I'm amazed they went to the trouble of that extra presswork.
I would have sat the tyre on a block of wood. (I may be slow but I'm rough)
I'm amazed they went to the trouble of that extra presswork.
I would have sat the tyre on a block of wood. (I may be slow but I'm rough)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.621 seconds