Skip to main content

81 Mack

More
1 year 7 months ago #239378 by Lang
81 Mack was created by Lang
The price seems pretty optimistic to me.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
1 year 7 months ago #239384 by Mrsmackpaul
Replied by Mrsmackpaul on topic 81 Mack
That's probably good buying these days for a E9 Superliner

I know it doesn't make sense but they are the flavor of the month

Paul

Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
The following user(s) said Thank You: 180wannabe

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
1 year 7 months ago #239386 by Oilman
Replied by Oilman on topic 81 Mack
Looks closer to yellow than burgundy.

1975 Atkinson, 180HP 6LXB Gardner, RTO910, 34000lb Rockwell on camelback

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
1 year 7 months ago #239397 by V8Ian
Replied by V8Ian on topic 81 Mack
Picture for illustration purposes only. :whistle:

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
1 year 7 months ago - 1 year 7 months ago #239408 by ElectricDreams
Replied by ElectricDreams on topic 81 Mack
Perhaps a "little" more rust in that roof gutter than described as well.

Curious, how does it get rated to 130T, brakes, chassis thickness, suspension?
Last edit: 1 year 7 months ago by ElectricDreams.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
1 year 7 months ago #239411 by Mrsmackpaul
Replied by Mrsmackpaul on topic 81 Mack


Curious, how does it get rated to 130T, brakes, chassis thickness, suspension?

Yes along with gradability

Swishman or Rex would know more

Paul

Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
The following user(s) said Thank You: ElectricDreams

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Swishy
  • Offline
  • If U don't like my Driving .... well then get off the footpath ...... LOL
More
1 year 7 months ago #239413 by Swishy
Replied by Swishy on topic 81 Mack
Everything is taken into account
Overall gearing, tyre foot print, chassis capacity, bit of torque to make it happen etc
1st off the bigger the rating the more U pay for the beast .... ideal for me is
enuff gearing to be able spin the wheels with maximum weight on drive on good traction road eg dry bitumen or concrete
Oversize = 18.5t on tandem drive
cya

OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST

There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
The following user(s) said Thank You: 180wannabe, PaulFH, ElectricDreams

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
1 year 7 months ago - 1 year 7 months ago #239664 by Steve L
Replied by Steve L on topic 81 Mack
I have an 81 Superliner rated at 200T . It’s a 440hp 10 speed with a factory 4 speed spicer air shift and 5.73 back end. Only a handful of this configuration were made with camelback before they went to Berliet or Meritor diffs. It’s friggin slow I need to find 5.02’s

Steve
Last edit: 1 year 7 months ago by Steve L.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Dave_64

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
1 year 7 months ago #239669 by Mrsmackpaul
Replied by Mrsmackpaul on topic 81 Mack
I gather the back end is 44's of the Mack type ?
If so then changing ratios shouldn't be a big head ache


Paul

Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
The following user(s) said Thank You: Steve L

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
1 year 7 months ago #239671 by Lang
Replied by Lang on topic 81 Mack
Wow Paul you are an early riser. I am waiting for a fishing mate what is your excuse?

Lang

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.462 seconds