Skip to main content

1965 Commer Knocker

More
8 months 3 weeks ago #247289 by Lang
1965 Commer Knocker was created by Lang
The following user(s) said Thank You: 180wannabe, PaulFH, wee-allis

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 3 weeks ago #247291 by Mrsmackpaul
Replied by Mrsmackpaul on topic 1965 Commer Knocker
That must be just about at the end of the Commer Knocker run in Australia I would think

Paul

Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 3 weeks ago #247298 by overnite
Replied by overnite on topic 1965 Commer Knocker
I think the last Knocker was early 1969.
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH, xspanrman

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 3 weeks ago #247302 by jeffo
Replied by jeffo on topic 1965 Commer Knocker
You could buy a two stroke in 71. End of the line but still way over priced which was why I bought the AEC instead.
Lots of those big cab Commers rebranded as Dodge with V8 petrol or Cummins started appearing in 72.
I remember when this operator crashed his two stroke in August 72, he couldn’t get a two stroke to replace it, bought a baby Cummins ACCO instead.
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH, wee-allis

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 3 weeks ago #247303 by JOHN.K.
Replied by JOHN.K. on topic 1965 Commer Knocker
TNT had a big fleet of what must have been the last knockers .....supposedly 150hp and full air brakes ..........they also had a lot of D series Fords with V8 Perkins ,with FORD on the rocker covers .....caused a few pub arguments there.
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 3 weeks ago #247304 by jeffo
Replied by jeffo on topic 1965 Commer Knocker
Yes I see the one in Lang’s post has airpack brakes. Think the last models had wedge type full air brakes.
Probably 135hp but pretty honest horses, not like the 180 lame ones in my AEC.
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 3 weeks ago #247307 by 77louie400
Replied by 77louie400 on topic 1965 Commer Knocker

Yes I see the one in Lang’s post has airpack brakes. Think the last models had wedge type full air brakes.
Probably 135hp but pretty honest horses, not like the 180 lame ones in my AEC.






Dad had one with air brakes, it had the bigger motor, I don't know what that meant but it traveled ok with the 160 Cummins inters doing the same job, maybe he drove it harder I don't really know.
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 3 weeks ago - 8 months 3 weeks ago #247310 by Swanny
Replied by Swanny on topic 1965 Commer Knocker
A flash Commer knocker in this group. N M P
Last edit: 8 months 3 weeks ago by Swanny.
The following user(s) said Thank You: 180wannabe, Morris, Lang, PaulFH, asw120, wee-allis

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 2 weeks ago #247312 by jeffo
Replied by jeffo on topic 1965 Commer Knocker
Carting identical loads in the 70’s, multiple times per day gave us an excellent comparison base for the brands available in our particular tare weight.
Two stroke Commer in their largest hp was best for economy and generally getting the job done.
C160 Cummins came in next, good value no frills light weight truck.
F86 Volvo surprised everyone, a good little performer.
After that the various Mercedes, MAN, Deutz etc had a bit more hp but were expensive to purchase.
Leyland and Mack were in a heavier bracket, more hp but not really comparing apples with apples.
The following user(s) said Thank You: 180wannabe, Lang, Mrsmackpaul, PaulFH, wee-allis

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
8 months 2 weeks ago #247313 by Lang
Replied by Lang on topic 1965 Commer Knocker
I seem to remember Italian and Eastern Europeans liked those old shape Commers particularly for car carriers. Boy those car trailers were crude in the day,

Lang
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.484 seconds