- Posts: 2237
- Thank you received: 5527
Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
1 year 11 months ago #234733
by PaulFH
Replied by PaulFH on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
The following user(s) said Thank You: overlander, oliver1950
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 year 11 months ago #234734
by PaulFH
Replied by PaulFH on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 year 11 months ago #234735
by PaulFH
Replied by PaulFH on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 year 11 months ago #234815
by PaulFH
Replied by PaulFH on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 year 11 months ago #234816
by PaulFH
Replied by PaulFH on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
The following user(s) said Thank You: overlander, oliver1950
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 year 11 months ago #234818
by PaulFH
Replied by PaulFH on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
The following user(s) said Thank You: overlander, oliver1950
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 year 11 months ago #234820
by PaulFH
Replied by PaulFH on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 6830
- Thank you received: 4758
1 year 11 months ago #234830
by Mrsmackpaul
Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
Replied by Mrsmackpaul on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
The 671 TT appears to of had a pretty good amount of power over a wide rev range
Shame these never took off, guessing to little and to late in the game to be desirable
Thats a big v 16 by the looks
Paul
Shame these never took off, guessing to little and to late in the game to be desirable
Thats a big v 16 by the looks
Paul
Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 year 11 months ago #234838
by Lang
Replied by Lang on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
One for Swishy or the other GM blokes.
Why did they bother with the 8V-92 when the 8V-71 covered the whole 92 range of torque and horsepower except for the last couple of the very biggest injector models?
Lang
Why did they bother with the 8V-92 when the 8V-71 covered the whole 92 range of torque and horsepower except for the last couple of the very biggest injector models?
Lang
The following user(s) said Thank You: PaulFH
Please Log in to join the conversation.
1 year 11 months ago - 1 year 11 months ago #234839
by Swishy
OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST
There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
Replied by Swishy on topic Detroit GM - Overlander's Data Collection
Lang
gudday m8
RE: Why did they bother with the 8V-92 when the 8V-71 covered the whole 92 range
A: because they cood
LOL
thinkn turbo n a 8v71 T were available B4 92 series came on the scene
BIDS2BC
cya
gudday m8
RE: Why did they bother with the 8V-92 when the 8V-71 covered the whole 92 range
A: because they cood
LOL
thinkn turbo n a 8v71 T were available B4 92 series came on the scene
BIDS2BC
cya
OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST
There's more WORTH in KENWORTH
Last edit: 1 year 11 months ago by Swishy.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Lang
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.583 seconds