Lang's new Mack toy carrier

Morris
Offline

3 years 4 months ago #216882 by Morris

Replied by Morris on topic Lang's new Mack toy carrier

I only know Strine with a few words from England thrown in, I have picked up the odd word from one or two other languages and I am enjoying learning Swishtopian.

I have my shoulder to the wheel,
my nose to the grindstone,
I've put my best foot forward,
I've put my back into it,
I'm gritting my teeth,

Now I find I can't do any work in this position!

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Swishy
Offline
If U don't like my Driving .... well then get off the footpath ...... LOL

3 years 4 months ago #216885 by Swishy

Replied by Swishy on topic Lang's new Mack toy carrier

Morrie m80

if U N joy learnin it
can U splain it 2 me

LOL

OF ALL THE THINGS EYE MISS ................. EYE MISS MY MIND THE MOST

There's more WORTH in KENWORTH

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Lang
Topic Author
Offline

3 years 4 months ago #216886 by Lang

Replied by Lang on topic Lang's new Mack toy carrier

Back to the Mack.

Anybody care to make a guess at what fuel consumption would be lightly loaded? 265hp turbo 6. I know it is what it is but nice to have some idea in advance.

Lang

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Mrsmackpaul
Offline

3 years 4 months ago #216889 by Mrsmackpaul

Replied by Mrsmackpaul on topic Lang's new Mack toy carrier

10 MPG empty 7 loaded into a head wind

A coolpower Mack should get 6.5 with one trailer and 4.5 - 4 with 2 or more

Paul

Your better to die trying than live on your knees begging

The following user(s) said Thank You: Lang

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Lang
Topic Author
Offline

3 years 4 months ago #216890 by Lang

Replied by Lang on topic Lang's new Mack toy carrier

Thanks Paul.

For those struggling with mpg and kml and km per 100 put this in your tool bar. It has conversions for everything under the sun. I use it almost every day.

www.onlineconversion.com/

lang

The following user(s) said Thank You: IHScout, allan

Please Log in to join the conversation.

hayseed
Offline

3 years 4 months ago #216891 by hayseed

Replied by hayseed on topic Lang's new Mack toy carrier

Lang wrote: Back to the Mack.

Anybody care to make a guess at what fuel consumption would be lightly loaded? 265hp turbo 6. I know it is what it is but nice to have some idea in advance.

Lang

Lang, I'd budget on 3km to the Litre.. everything over that's a bonus..

"Be who you are and say what you feel...
Because those that matter...
don't mind...
And those that mind....
don't matter." -

The following user(s) said Thank You: Lang

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Lang
Topic Author
Offline

3 years 4 months ago #216892 by Lang

Replied by Lang on topic Lang's new Mack toy carrier

Thanks for that. About what I thought.

As the old man always said "Fuel is the cheapest thing associated with owning a vehicle". He started telling me this in the 60's when petrol was 2/6 per gallon (6 cents per litre). Probably still true with depreciation, insurance, registration and repairs.

Lang

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Morris
Offline

3 years 4 months ago #216896 by Morris

Replied by Morris on topic Lang's new Mack toy carrier

Swishy m8, i will be happy ter splain wot i no the nex time we sit at tha same table at Yarra Glen. You kan bie tha first round!

I have my shoulder to the wheel,
my nose to the grindstone,
I've put my best foot forward,
I've put my back into it,
I'm gritting my teeth,

Now I find I can't do any work in this position!

Please Log in to join the conversation.